Kanban vs Agile: What’s the Best Choice for Teams in 2025?

Kanban and Agile are popular project management methods employed by teams across industries to organize work, boost productivity, and adapt to change. Both methods support teams in delivering project value, but each one differs in primary focus, structure, and team roles. Understanding their differences further can help you choose the right method for your project. In this article, I’ll break down how Kanban vs Agile compare, where each method works best, and what to consider when deciding between them.

What is Agile?

Agile is a project management methodology that emphasizes flexibility and the ability to adapt to change throughout the project lifecycle. More than just a process, Agile is a mindset focused on delivering incremental value incrementally through continuous iteration.

Instead of completing a project in one go, Agile breaks it down into smaller, manageable units called sprints. This method was developed as an alternative to the traditional waterfall approach, which follows a strict, linear sequence where each phase must be completed in a fixed sequence.

Agile originated in software development to address constantly changing requirements and the need to deliver work in small, manageable increments that eventually form a complete product. Each sprint follows a full cycle of planning, execution, and evaluation, enabling teams to adapt quickly to changes and continuously improve the product until it becomes fully functional and ready for use. Agile is especially widely used in product development, where teams need to minimize waste, maintain transparency, and continually improve quality with every iteration

What is Kanban? 

Kanban is a visual workflow tool used within the Agile framework to represent and track work as it moves through different stages. At its core, kanban is a board divided into columns that represent stages of the workflow—such as To Do, In Progress, and Done. Tasks appear as individual cards on the board and move from one column to the next as work progresses. This visual setup helps teams maintain a steady flow, quickly identify bottlenecks, and improve efficiency.

One of Kanban’s primary goals is to limit the amount of work in progress (WIP) at any given stage, allowing you to boost efficiency and focus on important tasks. Kanban works well for teams managing ongoing work, such as creative requests, software updates, or bug tracking, where priorities often shift.

Comparing Agile vs Kanban: Key differences explained

Use this table to quickly see the difference between Agile versus Kanban in terms of approach, process, and team workflow.

Let’s take a closer look at the key differences between Agile and Kanban to help you understand how each method supports different project goals and workflows.

Approach

Agile follows a cycle-based approach where tasks are grouped into short, repetitive phases known as sprints. Each sprint has a defined duration and delivers a set of outcomes. Kanban, on the other hand, doesn’t rely on cycles; instead, every task moves through stages. This method allows for continuous progress without waiting for a new planning phase to begin.

Focus

Agile emphasizes iteration by encouraging regular check-ins and team reviews. The goal is to improve the product with each sprint while responding to feedback. Kanban, in contrast, focuses on optimizing workflow and visualizing progress. This makes bottlenecks visible, limits work in progress, and improves efficiency without disrupting the process.

Team roles

Agile usually requires defined roles like scrum master, product owner, and developers, where each member has specific responsibilities. These roles promote structured planning and coordination within each sprint. Kanban teams often work without fixed roles, so there’s more flexibility and shared accountability. This makes Kanban easier to adopt since it doesn’t follow a formal structure.

Delivery model

With Agile, value is delivered at the end of each sprint once all tasks are complete and reviewed. This allows teams to group features and release them at a predictable pace. Kanban, however, supports continuous delivery, where tasks are released as soon as they’re ready. This makes Kanban ideal for teams that prioritize speed and responsiveness over fixed release schedules.

Pros and cons of Agile

Before you choose Agile for your next project, it’s important to understand its key advantages and limitations in real-world use.

Pros and cons of Kanban

Now that you’re familiar with Agile’s pros and cons, let’s shift focus and explore how Kanban compares.

When to use Agile vs Kanban 

The key to choosing between Agile methodology vs Kanban starts with knowing how your team works, the type of projects you manage, and the degree of structure your team requires. It’s also important to understand the strengths and limitations of each method so you can choose the one that aligns with your workflow and project demands. 

If your work involves changing requirements, feedback loops, and time-based planning, Agile offers the structure to keep you on track. On the other hand, if your team handles a steady flow of incoming tasks with shifting priorities and you value visual clarity, Kanban gives you the flexibility and transparency to manage work efficiently.

To help you choose which one meets your team’s needs, let’s break down the scenarios where each method works best.

Use Agile if:

1. Customer feedback plays a key role in the process so your team can make quick, informed adjustments to ensure the product meets their needs.
2. Back-and-forth communication between developers and stakeholders is essential to keep everyone aligned on goals, priorities, and expectations.
3. Your project has shifting requirements or an unclear end solution. You can trust Agile to give your team the flexibility to adapt features and timelines as new information becomes available.

Use Kanban if:

1. Your team handles a steady flow of incoming requests that differ in size and urgency with no strict deadlines.
   
2. Your project priorities shift often, and you need a system like Kanban that lets you adjust tasks on the fly without disrupting the entire workflow.
   
3. You value visual clarity and transparency, so everyone can see task progress and identify bottlenecks at a glance.

Whichever approach you choose, both methods offer a range of advantages, especially with the right project management software that offers the features required for Agile or Kanban.

Agile and Kanban software recommendations

Choosing the right project management software can make Agile and Kanban methodologies more effective and easier to manage. The tools below offer features that support collaboration, task tracking, and workflow visibility, along with Kanban board software solutions to help teams visualize progress and manage work more efficiently.

Best for	Visual-focused project tracking	Detailed task ownership	Spreadsheet-based project management	Software dev teams	Cross-department collaboration	Kanban-driven task organization
Free plan	✓	✓	✘	✓	✓	✓
Monthly starting fee	$12	$10	$12	$9	$10(billed yearly)	$6
	Visit monday.com	Visit ClickUp	Visit Smartsheet	Visit Jira	Visit Wrike	Visit Trello

Switching between Agile and Kanban

Agile and Kanban aren’t opposing methods because they’re flexible enough to complement each other. If your team works in sprints but starts handling more unpredictable or continuous tasks, switching to Kanban can simplify your workflow by removing time-based constraints. Otherwise, if your team outgrows the structureless nature of Kanban and needs more planning and structure, shifting into a full Agile framework like Scrum can provide the pace and accountability you’re seeking.

Some teams even blend the two by using kanban boards within a Scrum process, a hybrid approach that balances predictability and flexibility. Ultimately, the method you choose (or switch to) should support how your team works best, instead of locking you into a fixed system.

FAQs